Twitter, peer review and altmetrics: the future of research impact assessment

25/09/2012 – 8:38 am
Tony McCall

“No one can read everything. We rely on filters to make sense of the scholarly literature, but the narrow, traditional filters are being swamped. However, the growth of new, online scholarly tools allows us to make new filters; these altmetrics reflect the broad, rapid impact of scholarship in this burgeoning ecosystem. We call for more tools and research based on altmetrics.”

This quote is taken from the introduction to the altmetrics manifesto. And the reason it’s a manifesto, rather than a mission or vision statement, is arguably because changing the way scholarly impact is measured is going to need something of a revolution – and no revolution is complete without a manifesto.

So why is a revolution needed? Because long before the tools even existed to do anything about it, many in the research community have bemoaned the stranglehold the impact factor of a research paper has held over research funding, careers and reputations. As bloggers Victor Manning and William Gunn wrote: “Influence is only one dimension of importance”. Other bugbears include the slowness of peer review and the fact that impact is not linked to an article, but rather to a journal, as this blog from the Scholarly Kitchen points out.

More at:-


http://www.guardian.co.uk/higher-education-network/blog/2012/sep/19/peer-review-research-impact-altmetrics

author: Eliza Anyangwe
source: The Guardian – Higher Education Network (19/9/12)

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.